Librarians across the country are facing a growing fear of new penalties, including the possibility of prison time, as activists intensify their challenges against certain books. This escalating tension underscores a broader conflict over censorship and freedom of expression in libraries and schools.

Impact of Missouri Legislation on Literary Access

In 2019, educators in Clayton, Missouri, quickly chose to keep copies of Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" in high school libraries when its illustrated edition was released. Atwood's novel tackles female oppression in a dystopian world. The illustrated edition is beneficial for captivating teenagers who find conventional texts challenging.

However, a notable change took place in 2022 with the passing of a Missouri law penalizing librarians who store sexually explicit materials. Consequently, the Clayton school district reevaluated its stance, removing the newly released edition of Atwood's work from its libraries.

Tom Bober, the district's library coordinator and leader of the Missouri Association of School Librarians, justified this decision, citing a specific panel depicting a rape scene as a violation of state law. This action mirrors a broader national trend, where surges in challenges and bans on books stem from complaints by community members and conservative groups such as Moms for Liberty. In response, lawmakers propose stricter penalties for distributing materials deemed unsuitable. 

Restrictions on Content in Libraries Across the U.S.

Debates often focus on defining terms like 'obscene' and 'harmful,' with books addressing race and LGBTQ+ issues being central. Self-censorship among librarians and educators became common practice to avoid potential legal repercussions. 

READ ALSO: Australian Authors Challenge Aging Stereotypes in New Novels

More than 15 states have introduced bills for stricter regulations on libraries and their staff. Recent legislation in Utah grants the Attorney General authority to oversee the removal of 'sensitive' books from school libraries. 

Idaho considers permitting prosecutors to press charges against libraries for failing to remove 'harmful' materials. The bill seeks to restrict materials deemed unsuitable for minors in Idaho libraries according to current state law and is currently waiting for Gov. Brad Little's approval.

A Borough Assembly in Alaska has recently agreed to establish a new citizen committee responsible for reviewing challenged books in the borough's library collections. This seven-member committee, nominated by Borough Mayor Edna DeVries and approved by the Assembly, is not mandated to comprise librarians or individuals with literary expertise. The new committee supplants the previous review body, which included librarians and members of the borough's library advisory panel selected by the recreation manager.

Laws have changed since the 1973 Miller v. California case, in which the Supreme Court set rules for what is considered obscene. Recent laws in places like Arkansas and Indiana now make it illegal for educators and librarians to share materials labeled as 'obscene' or 'harmful,' leading to fines and jail time. These laws have caused schools to adjust their library policies and made educators worried about breaking the rules by mistake.

Deborah Caldwell-Stone, from the American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom, expressed concerns about these legal changes, which erode longstanding protections for educators and librarians. Despite legal standards established since the 1960s, recent laws expose professionals to prosecution for providing materials deemed objectionable.

Such legislation has already led to policy changes in school libraries and raised anxiety among educators. Despite opposition from advocacy groups, including librarians and publishers, some lawmakers advocate for stricter penalties, reflecting broader societal debates on censorship and freedom of expression.

RELATED ARTICLE: Idaho Senate Approves Bill to Regulate Library Materials