As the 2024 elections approach, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has introduced a novel approach to counter disinformation: comics. However, these publications might not have reached the majority; they appealed to a specific group of Congressional members who considered them threatening and violating First Amendment rights. 

Government-Led Comic Series Tackles Disinformation

Led by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the comics aim to address the widespread problem of disinformation, particularly its impact on shaping public opinion and electoral procedures. Nonetheless, there is significant concern that government participation in shaping narratives and defining truth might unintentionally violate civil liberties and intensify worries regarding excessive government control.

The comics, introduced before the Trump-Biden presidential race in 2020, were crafted to act as a timeless weapon in the continuous fight against disinformation. The collection includes graphic novels like "Real Fake" and "Bug Bytes," delving into subjects such as election meddling and COVID-19 misinformation. Penned by Clint Watts, a former FBI agent, and Farid Haque, an education technology entrepreneur, these works seek to heighten awareness and promote analytical thinking regarding disinformation strategies.

CISA cautions that disinformation poses a significant danger to the United States and its democratic system, encompassing critical infrastructure. The comics seek to inform readers about the perils of misinformation through fictional narratives inspired by actual situations.

CISA advises engaging in media literacy by verifying sources, exploring various perspectives, and depending on credible information outlets to counter disinformation effectively. The series emphasizes the need to evaluate information sources to mitigate the impact of foreign influence operations on society and democracy.

READ ALSO: Stephen Breyer Advocates Pragmatic Approach to Constitutional Interpretation in New Book 'Reading the Constitution'

Concerns Over Government's Role in Countering Disinformation

Criticism underscores concerns about the government's role in curating information and potentially stifling free speech in its efforts to counter disinformation campaigns, both domestic and foreign.

Rep. Dan Bishop from North Carolina said the comics were 'creepy.' He feared they were another way for the government to limit free speech. Sen. Rand Paul from Kentucky joked that even DC Comics would not want to publish these comics, calling them a waste of taxpayer money.

Despite efforts to promote these comics as educational resources in the fight against disinformation, their impact remains uncertain. They have not gained significant attention, as evidenced by the limited number of shares and views on online platforms. Critics argued that these comics may fail to effectively convey the severity of disinformation threats and may inadvertently trivialize the issue.

The central debate focuses on DHS's role in tackling disinformation and the strategies used for this purpose. Supporters argued that critical infrastructure, such as cognitive infrastructure, should be protected from manipulation and deceit. However, skeptics expressed concerns about these efforts' effectiveness and potential consequences.

The future of these comics and how DHS deals with disinformation are still subject to scrutiny. With the rise of information warfare and the need to protect democracy, it is crucial to strike a balance between security and preserving freedoms, a challenge for policymakers and the public. 

Using Comics to Address Threats

CISA's graphic novels are not the first instance in recent history where government agencies have utilized comics to address threats. For example, the CDC created a zombie apocalypse comic to promote emergency preparedness. The US Army Cyber Institute also collaborated with researchers to produce graphic novels about modern dangers like drones and hackers.

CISA's Resilience Series stands out because it places the responsibility on individuals to confront misinformation and disinformation. Unlike typical government publications, these comics highlight the triumph of non-governmental actors, with governments and corporations playing peripheral roles at best.

While the series delivers an essential message of vigilance, it sometimes comes across as overtly patriotic, resembling the threats it seeks to combat. Despite this, the series effectively communicates the need for public awareness and engagement in safeguarding against information threats.

RELATED ARTICLE: New Book 'If We Burn' Analyzes Why a Decade of Mass Protests Yielded Little Change