Some books are called 'unfilmable' because they seem too hard to turn into movies. They are too complicated or abstract. However, a few of these books have actually been made into films, surprising everyone and entertaining viewers.

Let us explore some of these extraordinary stories that made it from page to screen. 

The Lord of the Rings

This expansive fantasy narrative has lots of details and covers many books with complicated characters, cultures, and stories. Turning this into a film posed significant logistical challenges. Lots of filmmakers thought about doing it but were unable to do so.

The Beatles sought to create a film adaptation and approached Stanley Kubrick to direct. The band members envisioned themselves in significant roles. However, Kubrick and even J.R.R. Tolkien himself rejected the idea, deeming the project unfilmable. Also, the technology back then was not good enough for such a big project. However, eventually, three decades later, Peter Jackson made the books into incredible movies that looked really impressive and became famous.

Jackson's adaptations worked well because they stayed true to Tolkien's story. Instead of squeezing everything in or making it too dramatic, Jackson picked the most important parts and showed them on screen. The movies also looked great, thanks to the fantastic scenery of New Zealand and all the careful artistry.

3 Body Problem

In his 2008 sci-fi novel "The Three-Body Problem," Cixin Liu crafted an intriguing universe where advanced particle physics, virtual reality gaming, and Chinese history intertwined to address a looming global peril. According to The Verge, the book is daunting to adapt to the film due to its profound exploration of cultural memory and the intricate nature of its central enigma, suggesting it was a narrative best suited for the written form.

Netflix took on the challenge, enlisting "Game of Thrones" creators Benioff and Weiss as writers for the adaptation. The novels span three books, each with different protagonists and timelines, making adaptation challenging. Benioff and Weiss opted for a bold approach, introducing all significant characters early on and intertwining plotlines from all three books in the first season. This strategy condensed dense scientific explanations from the books, focusing more on the plot.

However, the series struggled to capture the characters' depth from the novels and compressed narratives, hindering thematic resonance. Despite its shortcomings, the adaptation is a commendable effort to translate seemingly unfilmable material to the screen.

READ ALSO: 5 Fantasy Book-to-TV Adaptations That Hit the Mark

Dune

"Dune" was deemed impossible to adapt because of its blend of intricate themes, detailed world-building, and grand visuals. Past efforts to bring Frank Herbert's novel to screen struggled to convey the depth of its concepts and the intricacies of its plot. Additionally, the psychedelic visions of the future depicted in the book posed difficulties in translating to a visual medium. The story's vast scope and the unique factions and characters involved made it a daunting task for filmmakers to bring to life successfully.

Denis Villeneuve's adaptation surprised everyone by delivering striking visuals and an immersive world. His skill in creating expansive visuals and focusing on details brought Arrakis to life, giving depth to every group and character. This careful method added authenticity to the story, making the storytelling richer.

As reported by The Guardian, Villeneuve hesitated to adapt future books in the series, citing them as 'esoteric.' The challenge lay in the fact that while the first two parts of "Dune" have been successfully adapted, the later books in the series venture into increasingly surreal and unfilmable territory. The psychedelic and esoteric elements that make the "Dune" series unique also pose difficulties for adaptation, as they become more prominent in later books. Villeneuve succeeded in telling the revenge story in the first two parts, but bringing the later books' abstract and surreal parts to the screen is tough for filmmakers.

Game of Thrones

HBO's "Game of Thrones" adaptation is a huge TV success despite some negative critiques of the ending. It turned a complicated fantasy book series into the most popular TV show worldwide. As it became more famous, its budget got more extensive, making it one of the most expensive shows ever made. One of its most significant impacts might be showing how well TV can adapt huge book series.

Entertainment Weekly reported that George R. R. Martin, the author of "Game of Thrones," initially aimed to craft an epic tale deemed 'unfilmable' with his "Song of Ice and Fire" series, which includes "Game of Thrones" and its sequels. Martin, drawing from his time in Hollywood, felt constrained by the restrictions of scriptwriting. This led him to pursue novel writing as a way to express his creative ideas freely without constraints. He envisioned a sweeping story with numerous characters, epic battles, and fantastical beings.

Despite his initial skepticism about adapting his complex narrative for television, the adaptation defied expectations and became a cultural phenomenon. Martin attributed this success to David Benioff and D.B. Weiss, the executive producers and writers of the show. Their vision and dedication brought his epic saga to life in a spectacular and captivating manner.

RELATED ARTICLE: Netflix's '3 Body Problem' Writers Share Insights and Approach to Adaptation