Artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly changing many fields, and book production is no exception. People have a wide range of reactions to this new technology, from excitement about new possibilities to worry about threats to traditional authorship.
The author, R.O. Kwon, expressed concern about the word "scraping" because she thinks it sounds harsh. Other people in the literary world feel the same way. She felt violated when she learned that her book "The Incendiaries" was put into the Books3 dataset and used to build generative AI models without her permission.
Authors were angry and upset that tech companies were using their work without permission or payment, so they took to social media to express their displeasure. The years of hard work that writers like Kwon put into their books were suddenly used in machine learning models, which raised serious legal and moral questions.
Best-selling author Douglas Preston is one of the people suing Microsoft and OpenAI as part of a class action. He said it might be the biggest scam in the history of creativity. The Authors Guild supported the case, saying these companies broke copyright laws by using books in their generative AI models without permission.
OpenAI and Microsoft argued that using copyrighted content to teach their models is like reading books to hone writing. Whichever way the judge sees "fair use," the outcome of this case could have a huge impact on creative businesses in the future.
READ ALSO: Publishing Leaders Discuss Industry Trends and Challenges at 2024 U.S. Book Show
People using copyrighted material without permission is a huge problem. At the same time, the publishing business is looking into how AI can give writers new opportunities. In 2020, large language models popularized generative AI. They are changing how some books are written, released, and read. The publishing business is moving toward efficiency and consolidation, and these models fit that trend as they could cut costs and speed up production.
However, the quick adoption of AI in publication has caused some to question the direction of human writers in the future. Many AI-generated books will flood the market, which worries people and makes life even more difficult for writers.
Given the rise of AI-generated content, Amazon's Kindle Direct Publishing platform, which has helped the self-publishing business grow, recently put a daily limit of three books per author. Traditional writers often take years to write a single book, but AI can write several books in a day, which shows the effect of AI.
There still needs to be more disagreement about AI's place in writing. Some people think that generative AI can help writers by giving them feedback and creating new chances, but others are worried that it will make writing even more like any other job. Platforms like Inkitt and Sudowrite are already using AI to help writers plan and revise their work, but the more significant impacts of these technologies are still being felt.
As the legal fights over copyright and fair use continue, the publishing industry has to deal with a tricky situation where creativity and technology conflict. The future of books and the jobs of people who write them will depend on how these problems are solved. We do not know yet if AI will be a threat or an opportunity for writers, but it is clear that the business needs to change while protecting authors' rights and incomes.
RELATED ARTICLE: Inkitt Secures $37 Million Funding to Propel Its AI-Driven Self-Publishing Platform