A federal appeals court ruled that eight out of 17 books previously removed from a Texas library due to conservative complaints must be returned. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans made this decision, partly upholding a lower court's injunction in a 2-1 ruling.
Judge Jacques Wiener, who delivered the majority ruling, stressed that government employees are not allowed to take books out of public libraries to prevent access to ideas they find objectionable. The court determined that by taking these books out of circulation, the Llano Library had infringed upon the First Amendment rights of people trying to get information.
Judge Leslie Southwick concurred that officials cannot censor books based on their content. However, Southwick differed in the application of this principle, agreeing that nine books could stay off the shelves for now. He argued that these books were removed not for their viewpoints but because they contained juvenile humor, exemplified by "Gary the Goose and His Gas on the Loose." The dissenting judge, Stuart Duncan, believed that none of the books should be put back on the library's shelves.
Judge Wiener agreed with the lower court's decision to reinstate the books by highlighting the plaintiffs' likelihood of success and supporting their First Amendment claim. This ruling establishes the framework for the ongoing legal dispute because the lawsuit is now scheduled to move forward after being postponed pending the appeals court's ruling.
Llano, a small town with a population of around 22,000, has become a contentious battleground in the more extensive national debate over library book bans. This debate is incredibly intense in conservative states like Texas, where Republican lawmakers have pushed for the removal of books they consider inappropriate for children, often focusing on LGBTQ and racial issues.
At a Llano Tea Party meeting in February, conservative activist Bonnie Wallace, who served on the county library advisory board, urged attendees to vote against incumbent school board member Rob Wilson in the upcoming election.
Wallace accused Wilson's wife, an elementary school librarian in the Llano school district, of promoting inappropriate material to children, claiming without evidence that she "loves porn and puts it in the elementary school." Wallace's remarks mirror the persistent endeavors of influential individuals within the Llano campaign against certain books to sway the outcomes of local school board elections.
The controversy in Llano began when seven library patrons filed a federal lawsuit in 2022 over the removal of 17 books. In March 2023, U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman issued a preliminary injunction requiring the reinstatement of all the books, a directive that was followed. Subsequently, the Llano County commissioners contemplated closing all library branches to avoid the issue but ultimately decided against it.
In an April 2023 meeting, Wallace expressed support for the temporary closing of libraries to address what she described as "pornographic filth." In contrast, resident James Arno argued for keeping libraries open, emphasizing that parents should monitor their children's reading without restricting access for others. Arno stated that it is the parent's responsibility to be aware of their children's interests rather than shutting down libraries to prevent access to certain materials.
This case highlights the ongoing conflict over censorship, freedom of information, and the role of libraries. It shows the tension between community standards and constitutional rights, a debate that has taken place across the U.S.
RELATED ARTICLE: Former Librarian Files Lawsuit Against Llano County After Termination for Refusing Book Removal