The latest buzz on Netflix centers around the film 'Leave the World Behind,' directed and written by Sam Esmail, adapting Rumaan Alam's novel of the same name. With a star-studded cast including Julia Roberts, Ethan Hawke, and Mahershala Ali, this adaptation has become the no. 1 movie on Netflix, captivating the audience with its mysterious narrative.
The film diverges from Alam's novel's subtly stated disaster-movie elements, amplifying more of those elements in scenes, such as an oil tanker running aground, appealing to apocalypse enthusiasts. Roberts and Hawke portray Amanda and Clay Sandford, a Brooklyn couple on a last-minute getaway with their children, facing unexpected challenges when the house owner, G.H. Scott (Ali), arrives with his daughter, Ruth, to warn them about what is happening with the world.
However, as viewers dive into this Netflix sensation, some have expressed confusion, particularly regarding the ambiguous ending. Comments on platforms like Letterboxd reveal confusion, with viewers questioning the purpose and resolution of the narrative.
For those confused by the film's conclusion, it is essential to note that the novel, like the movie, deliberately leaves many questions unanswered. Alam employs strategies of oblique suggestion, including foreshadowing, to fill in certain blanks. One instance is the depiction of Archie, the Sandfords' teenage son, losing his teeth, possibly due to sonic blasts. While the movie opens Archie's fate to interpretation, the novel provides a more definitive outcome, suggesting that Archie had no chance of surviving.
The book delves into more extensive body horror than what is shown in the movie, exploring the consequences of mysterious events on various characters. Clay's physical sensations, Rose succumbing to cancer, possibly also caused by the noise that affected Archie, Karen also losing her teeth, and the implied connection between Archie's condition and a global catastrophe contribute to a more nuanced and unsettling conclusion in the novel.
The film introduces changes to certain characters and plotlines, such as the portrayal of Danny being more of a prepper in the film than Danny in the novel. However, the movie retains the essence of the novel's ambiguous ending, provoking thought and discussion among viewers.
At the film's conclusion, Rose discovers the neighbor's underground shelter and a DVD of the last season of 'Friends.' As she plays the series finale, the iconic theme song, 'I'll Be There For You' by the Rembrandts, accompanies the movie's closing credits. In the book, however, Rose departs from the neighbor's residence, gathering supplies and reuniting with her family.
Alam finds it dissatisfying to provide a definitive conclusion in the film, stating that it respects the viewer enough not to provide closure. Alam said that the audience is in possession of how the movie ends, as it is open for interpretation.
Despite the dissatisfaction expressed by some viewers, Alam appreciates the film deviating from the novel, particularly in the case of Rose, the Sanfords' daughter. The ambiguity in the book and movie has sparked debates about genre expectations and the challenges of interpreting a complex narrative. 'Leave the World Behind' refuses to offer a comforting resolution, challenging viewers to grapple with uncertainty.
RELATED ARTICLE: Eileen's Book-to-Movie Differences: Director William Oldroyd Explains the Changes in Plot